CT Lower Extremity (Ankle, Foot, Hip or Knee) - CAM 715HB

Description 

It is an expectation that all patients receive care/services from a licensed clinician. All appropriate supporting documentation, including recent pertinent office visit notes, laboratory data, and results of any special testing must be provided. If applicable: All prior relevant imaging results and the reason that alternative imaging cannot be performed must be included in the documentation submitted.

Where a specific clinical indication is not directly addressed in this guideline, medical necessity determination will be made based on widely accepted standard of care criteria. These criteria are supported by evidence-based or peer-reviewed sources such as medical literature, societal guidelines and state/national recommendations.
 

Policy
INDICATIONS FOR LOWER EXTREMITY CT (FOOT, ANKLE, KNEE, LEG, OR HIP)
Pre-condition

Plain radiographs must precede CT evaluation.
 

Joint or Muscle Pain (1,2,3)
Negative Findings on Orthopedic Exam and after X-Ray Completed
NOTE: Does not apply to young children (up to age 12). If MRI contraindicated or cannot be performed or requested as a CT arthrogram.

  • Persistent joint or musculotendinous pain unresponsive to conservative treatment*, within the last 6 months which includes active medical therapy (physical therapy, chiropractic treatments, and/or physician supervised exercise**) of at least four (4) weeks
  • With progression or worsening of symptoms during the course of conservative treatment

Joint Specific Provocative Exam Tests and Suspected Injuries (4)
Approvable Orthopedic Test:
With a positive orthopedic sign, an initial x-ray is always preferred; however, it is not required to approve advanced imaging UNLESS otherwise specified in bold below. Any test that suggests joint instability requires further imaging (the below list is not all inclusive)
NOTE: If MRI contraindicated or cannot be performed or requested as a CT arthrogram

Ankle (5,6)
If MRI contraindicated or cannot be performed;

  • Syndesmotic injury (high ankle injury) with tenderness to palpation over the syndesmosis (AITFL – anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament) and any of the following:(7,8)
    • Positive stress X-rays
    • Squeeze test
    • Cotton test
    • Dorsiflexion external rotation test
  • Unstable lateral injury to ATFL (anterior talofibular ligament) with suspicion of a possible associated fracture around the ankle or a possible osteochondral injury of the talus and any ONE of the following:(9)
    • Positive stress x-rays
    • Positive anterior drawer test with non-diagnostic or inconclusive X-rays
    • Positive posterior drawer test with non-diagnostic or inconclusive X-rays
  • Achilles tendon tear(10)
  • Thompson test or palpable partial or complete Achilles tendon defect on physical examination


Knee (11,12)
If MRI contraindicated or cannot be performed;

  • Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) Injury(13)
    • Positive testing:
      • Anterior drawer
      • Lachman’s
      • Pivot shift test
  • Suspected ACL Rupture - acute knee injury with physical exam limited by pain and swelling AFTER initial x-ray completed with any of the following (14)
    • Based on mechanism of injury, i.e., twisting, blunt force
      • Normal x-ray:

OR

  • Anyone one of the following:
    • Extreme pain,
    • Instability, to stand
    • Audible pop at time of injury
    • Very swollen joint with inability to perform the physical exam

OR

  • Abnormal x-ray:
    • Large knee effusion on x-ray
  • Acute mechanical locking of the knee not due to guarding(15)
  • Meniscal injury/tear (A positive test is denoted by pain or audible/palpable clunk)(16)
    • McMurray’s Compression
    • Apley’s
    • Thessaly test
  • Patellar dislocation (acute or recurrent)(17)
    • Positive patellofemoral apprehension test
    • Radiographic findings compatible with a history of patellar dislocation (i.e., lipohemarthrosis or osteochondral fracture)
  • Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury
  • Posterior drawer
  • Posterior tibial sag (Godfrey or step-off test)
  • Medial collateral ligament tear
    • Positive valgus stress testing/laxity
  • Lateral Collateral ligament tear
    • Positive Varus stress testing/laxity

Hip
If MRI contraindicated or cannot be performed;

  • Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) / Labral tear(18,19,20)
    • Anterior Impingement sign (aka FADIR test) (Hip or groin pain with hip flexion, adduction, and internal rotation
    • Posterior Impingement sign (Pain with hip extension and external rotation on exam)
    • Persistent hip mechanical symptoms (after initial radiographs completedincluding clicking, locking, catching, giving way or hip instability with a clinical suspicion of labral tear and/or radiographic findings suggestive of FAI (i.e., cross over sign, pistol grip deformity, alpha angle over 50 degrees) and suspected labral tear
    • Determine candidacy for hip preservation surgery for known FAI

NOTE: For evaluation of both hips when the patient meets hip MRI guidelines (x-ray + persistent pain unresponsive to conservative treatment) for both the right and left hip, Pelvis MRI (Evolent_CG_037) is the preferred study.

  • Labral tear is suspected and fulfills above criteria, then bilateral hip MRIs are the preferred studies (not Pelvis MRI)
  • Bilateral hip arthrograms are requested and otherwise meet guidelines, bilateral hip MRIs are the preferred studies (not Pelvis MRI)

Tendon Rupture (21,22)
After X-Ray and not Listed Above
High clinical suspicion of specific tendon rupture based on mechanism of injury and physical findings (i.e., palpable defect in quadriceps or patellar tendon rupture)
 

Trauma
Bone Fracture

  • Hip and Femur(23)
    • Suspected occult, stress or insufficiency fracture with a negative or non- diagnostic initial x-ray
      • Approve an immediate CT if contraindication to MRI or MRI cannot be performed (no follow up radiographs required)
    • Suspicion of a hip fracture in a pregnant patient does not require an initial x-ray
  • Non-hip extremities: suspected occult, stress, or insufficiency fracture(24)
    • If x-rays, taken 10-14 days after the injury or clinical assessment, are negative or non-diagnostic
    • If at high risk for a complete fracture with conservative therapy (e.g., navicular bone), then immediate CT is warranted
  • Pathologic or concern for impending fracture on x-ray or CT(24) – approve immediate CT
  • Suspected ligamentous/tendon injury with known fractures on x-ray/CT that may require surgery

Osteochondral Lesions (12,25,26)
Defects, Fractures, Osteochondritis Dissecans

Clinical suspicion based on mechanism of injury and physical findings
NOTE: X-ray completed


Joint Prosthesis/Replacement (27)

  • Suspected Metallosis with painful metal on metal hip replacement(28) after initial x- rays
    • After initial x-rays
    • Cobalt and chromium levels > 7ppb(29)
    • Abnormal joint aspiration

Extremity Mass (30)

  • Mass or lesion after non-diagnostic x-ray or ultrasound. CT is better than MRI to evaluate mass calcification or bone involvement and may complement or replace MRI (MRI is preferred)
    • Baker’s cyst should be initially evaluated with ultrasound
    • Superficial mass, then ultrasound is the initial study
    • Deep mass, then x-ray is the initial study
  • Vascular malformations(31)
    • After initial evaluation with ultrasound and results will change management or preoperative planning
      • CTA is also approvable for initial evaluation
    • Follow up after treatment/embolization

Known Primary Cancer of the Extremity (32,33,34,35)

  • Initial staging primary extremity tumor
  • Follow-up of known primary cancer of patient undergoing active treatment within the past year or as per surveillance imaging guidance for that cancer
  • Signs or symptoms or imaging findings suspicious for recurrence
  • Suspected metastatic disease with signs/symptoms and after initial imaging with radiographs

Further Evaluation of Indeterminate Findings on Prior Imaging
Unless follow-up is otherwise specified within the guideline

  • For initial evaluation of an inconclusive finding on a prior imaging report that requires further clarification
  • One follow-up exam of a prior indeterminate MR/CT finding to ensure no suspicious interval change has occurred. (No further surveillance unless specified as highly suspicious or change was found on last follow-up exam.)

Osteonecrosis (36)

  • When MRI is contraindicated or cannot be performed
  • To further characterize a prior abnormal x-ray
  • Normal or Indeterminate X-rays, but symptomatic and high risk (such as glucocorticosteroid use, renal transplant, glycogen storage disease, alcohol abuse, sickle cell anemia)
  • Known osteonecrosis to evaluate a contralateral joint after initial x-rays

e.g., Avascular Necrosis (AVN), Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease

Loose Bodies or Synovial Chondromatosis (37)
(After X-Ray or Ultrasound Completed)

  • In the setting of joint pain or mechanical symptoms

Infection of Bone, Joint, or Soft Tissue Abscess (38)

  • Abnormal x-ray or ultrasound
  • Negative x-ray or ultrasound but with a clinical suspicion of infection based on either of the following:
    • Signs and symptoms of joint or bone infection such as:
      • Pain and swelling
      • Decreased range of motion
      • Fevers
    • Laboratory findings of infection include any of the following:
      • Elevated ESR or CRP
      • Elevated white blood cell count
      • Positive joint aspiration
  • Ulcer (diabetic, pressure, ischemic, traumatic) with signs of infection (redness, warmth, swelling, pain, discharge which may range from white to serosanguineous) that is not improving despite treatment and bone, or deep infection is suspected(39)
    • Increased suspicion if size or temperature increases, bone is exposed/positive probe-to-bone test, new areas of breakdown, new smell
  • Neuropathic foot with friable or discolored granulation tissue, foul odor, non-purulent discharge, and delayed wound healing(39)

NOTE: MRI and nuclear medicine studies are recommended for acute infection as they are more sensitive in detecting early changes of osteomyelitis. CT is better at demonstrating findings of chronic osteomyelitis (sequestra, involucrum, cloaca, sinus tracts) as well as detecting soft tissue gas and foreign bodies.

Pre-Operative/Procedural Evaluation
Pre-operative evaluation for a planned surgery or procedure

Evaluation of Tumor
When needed for clarification of vascular invasion from tumor after prior imaging.

Post-Operative/Procedural Evaluation

  • When imaging, physical or laboratory findings indicate joint infection, delayed or non- healing or other surgical/procedural complications.
  • Trendelenburg sign(40) or other indication of muscle or nerve damage after recent hip surgery


Evaluation of Known or Suspected Autoimmune Disease (41,42)

MRI is contraindicated or cannot be performed:

  • Further evaluation of an abnormality or non-diagnostic findings on prior imaging
  • Initial imaging of a single joint for diagnosis or response to therapy after plain films and appropriate lab tests (e.g., RF, ANA, CRP, ESR)
  • To determine change in treatment or when diagnosis is uncertain prior to start of treatment
  • Follow-up to determine treatment efficacy of the following:
    • Early rheumatoid arthritis
    • Advanced rheumatoid arthritis if x-ray and ultrasound are equivocal or noncontributory

e.g., Rheumatoid Arthritis

Known or Suspected Inflammatory Myopathies (43)

  • For diagnosis
  • For biopsy planning

NOTE: If MRI is contraindicated or cannot be performed. Includes polymyositis, dermatomyositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, inclusion body myositis.

Crystalline Arthropathy (44)

  • Dual-energy CT can be used to characterize crystal deposition disease (i.e., gout) after:
    • Appropriate rheumatological work up and initial x-rays AND
    • After inconclusive joint aspiration or when joint aspiration cannot be performed

OR

  • In the setting of extra-articular crystal deposits (i.e., tendons or bursa)

Peripheral Nerve Entrapment (45,46)
MRI is contraindicated or cannot be performed, including any of the following:

  • Abnormal electromyogram or nerve conduction study
  • Abnormal x-ray or ultrasound
  • Clinical suspicion and failed 4 weeks conservative treatment including at least two of the following (active treatment with physical therapy is not required):
    • Activity modification
    • Rest, ice, or heat
    • Splinting or orthotics
    • Medication

e.g., Tarsal tunnel, Morton’s neuroma


Foreign Body (47)
Indeterminate x-ray and ultrasound

Painful Acquired or Congenital Flatfoot Deformity (48,49)
Adult

  • After X-ray completed
  • MRI is contraindicated or cannot be performed
  • After failure of active conservative therapy
    • Including at least two of the following (active treatment with physical therapy is not required):

■    Activity modification
■    Rest, ice, or heat
■    Splinting or orthotics
■    Medication
 

Pediatrics (Up to Age 18)

  • Osteoid Osteoma after and x-ray is done(50)
  • Painful flatfoot (pes planus) deformity with suspected tarsal coalition, not responsive to non-active conservative care (such as orthotics, rest etc.)(51)
    • When MRI cannot be performed
    • Extra articular coalition is suspected (bony bridges around the joints)
    • Surgical planning

Rationale
MRI

Plain radiographs are typically used as the first-line modality for assessment of lower extremity conditions. Computed tomography (CT) is used for evaluation of tumors, metastatic lesions, infection, fractures, and other problems. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the first-line choice for imaging of many conditions, but CT may be used in these cases if MRI is contraindicated or unable to be performed.

Special Note

  • Plain radiographs must precede CT evaluation unless otherwise indicated
  • Some indications are for MRI, CT, or MR or CT Arthrogram (more than one should not be approved at the same time)
  • If an CT Arthrogram fits approvable criteria below, approve as CT
  • MRI is usually the preferred study

OVERVIEW
*Conservative Therapy
Musculoskeletal should include a multimodality approach consisting of a combination of active and inactive components.
Inactive components such as rest, ice, heat, modified activities, medical devices, (including crutches, immobilizer, metal braces, orthotics, rigid stabilizer, or splints, etc. and not to include neoprene sleeves), medications, injections (bursal, and/or joint, not including trigger point), and diathermy, can be utilized.

Active modalities may consist of physical therapy, a physician supervised home exercise program**, and/or chiropractic care.
 

**Home Exercise Program (HEP)
The following two elements are required to meet guidelines for completion of conservative therapy:

  • Information provided on exercise prescription/plan AND
  • Follow-up with member with information provided regarding completion of HEP (after suitable 4-week period), or inability to complete HEP due to physical reason- i.e., increased pain, inability to physically perform exercises.

NOTE: Patient inconvenience or noncompliance without explanation does not constitute
“inability to complete” HEP

Joint Implants and Hardware
Dual-energy CT may be useful for metal artifact reduction if available but is also imperfect as the correction is based on a projected approximation of x-ray absorption, and it does not correct for scatter.(52) Dual-energy CT can be used to characterize crystal deposition disease, such as gout versus CPPD (calcium pyrophosphate deposition).(44)

CT and Osteolysis
Computed tomography scans show both the extent and the location of lytic lesions, they are useful to guide treatment decisions, as well as to assist in planning for surgical intervention when needed, in patients with suspected osteolysis after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA).

Contraindication and Preferred Studies

  • Contraindications and reasons why a CT/CTA cannot be performed may include: impaired renal function, significant allergy to IV contrast, pregnancy (depending on trimester)
  • Contraindications and reasons why an MRI/MRA cannot be performed may include: impaired renal function, claustrophobia, non-MRI compatible devices (such as non- compatible defibrillator or pacemaker), metallic fragments in a high-risk location, patient exceeds wight limit/dimensions of MRI machine

References 

  1. Katz J N, Brophy R H, Chaisson C E, de Chaves L, Cole B J et al. Surgery versus physical therapy for a meniscal tear and osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 1675-84. 10.1056/NEJMoa1301408.
  2. Mordecai S C, Al-Hadithy N, Ware H E, Gupte C M. Treatment of meniscal tears: An evidence based approach. World J Orthop. 2014; 5: 233-41. 10.5312/wjo.v5.i3.233.
  3. Tafur M, Bencardino J, Roberts C, Appel M, Bell A et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Foot Pain. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2020; 17: S391 - S402. 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.015.
  4. Fox M, Chang E, Amini B, Bernard S, Gorbachova T et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Knee Pain. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2018; 15: S302 - S312. 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.016.
  5. Chen E T, Borg-Stein J, McInnis K C. Ankle Sprains: Evaluation, Rehabilitation, and Prevention. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2019; 18: 217-223. 10.1249/jsr.0000000000000603.
  6. Jungmann P, Lange T, Wenning M, Baumann F, Bamberg F. Ankle Sprains in Athletes: Current Epidemiological, Clinical and Imaging Trends. Open access journal of sports medicine. 2023; 14: 29-46. 10.2147/OAJSM.S397634.
  7. Netterström-Wedin F, Matthews M, Bleakley C. Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Tests Assessing Ligamentous Injury of the Talocrural and Subtalar Joints: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Sports health. 2022; 14: 336-347. 10.1177/19417381211029953.
  8. de-Las-Heras Romero J, Alvarez A, Sanchez J, Garcia A, Porcel P, et al. Management of syndesmotic injuries of the ankle. EFORT open reviews. 2017; 2: 403-409. 10.1302/2058- 5241.2.160084.
  9. Chen R, Wang Q, Li M, Su X, Wang D et al. Progress in diagnosis and treatment of acute injury to the anterior talofibular. World journal of clinical cases. 2023; 11: 3395-3407. 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i15.3395.
  10. Periasamy M, Venkatramani H, Shanmuganathan R. Management of Chronic Achilles Tendon Injuries-Review of Current Protocols and. Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of. 2019; 52: 109-116. 0.1055/s-0039-1687923.
  11. Chien A, Weaver J, Kinne E, Omar I. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. Polish journal of radiology. 2020; 85: e509-e531. 10.5114/pjr.2020.99415.
  12. Taljanovic M, Chang E, Ha A, Bartolotta R, Bucknor M et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Trauma to the Knee. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2020; 17: S12 - S25. 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.041.
  13. Kulwin R L, Schmidt G J, Snyder D A, Klitzman R G. Clinical Examination in the Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Blinded, Cross-sectional Evaluation. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & 2023; 7: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D- 22-00123.
  14. Li X, Hou Q, Zhan X, Chang L, Ma X. The accuracy of MRI in diagnosing and classifying acute traumatic multiple ligament knee injuries. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2022; 23: 10.1186/s12891- 021-04976-1.
  15. Hussin P, Mawardi M, Nizlan N. The Chalky Culprit of acute locked knee. G Chir. Sep-Oct 2014; 35: 239-40.
  1. Smoak J B, Matthews J R, Vinod A V, Kluczynski M A, Bisson L J. An Up-to-Date Review of the Meniscus Literature: A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020; 8: 10.1177/2325967120950306.
  2. Hayat Z, El Bitar Y, Case J. Patella Dislocation. [Updated 2023 Jul 4]. StatPearls Publishing. 2023; Accessed on February 15, 2024: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538288/.
  3. Groh M, Herrera J. A comprehensive review of hip labral tears. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. Jun 2009; 2: 105-17. 10.1007/s12178-009-9052-9.
  4. Hananouchi T, Yasui Y, Yamamoto K, Toritsuka Y, Ohzono K. Anterior impingement test for labral lesions has high positive predictive value. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Dec 2012; 470: 3524-9. 10.1007/s11999-012-2450-0.
  5. O'Rourke R, El Bitar Y. Femoroacetabular Impingement. [Updated 2023 Jun 26]. StatPearls Publishing. 2023; Accessed on February 15, 2024: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547699/.
  6. Hsu H, Siwiec R. Patellar Tendon Rupture. [Updated 2023 Feb 13]. StatPearls Publishing. 2023; Accessed February 15, 2024: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513275/.
  7. Shamrock A, Dreyer M, Varacallo M. Achilles Tendon Rupture. [Updated 2023 Aug 17]. StatPearls Publishing. 2023; Accessed on February 15, 2024: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430844/.
  8. Ross A B, Lee K S, Chang E Y, Amini B, Bussell J K et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Hip Pain-Suspected Fracture. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2019; 16: S18 - S25. 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.028.
  9. Bencardino J, Stone T, Roberts C, Appel M, Baccei S et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) Stress (Fatigue/Insufficiency) Fracture, Including Sacrum, Excluding Other Vertebrae. J Am Coll Radiol. May 2017; 14: S293-s306. 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.035.
  10. Mintz D N, Roberts C C, Bencardino J T, Baccei S J, Caird M S et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) Chronic Hip Pain. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017; 14: S90-s102. 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.035.
  11. Pedersen M, DaCambra M, Jibri Z, Dhillon S, Jen H. Acute Osteochondral Fractures in the Lower Extremities - Approach to Identification and Treatment. The open orthopaedics journal. 2015; 9: 463-74. 10.2174/1874325001509010463.
  12. Ong N, Zailan I, Tandon A. Imaging update in arthroplasty. Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma. 2021; 23: 101649. 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101649.
  13. Lee A, Paiement G D, Penenberg B L, Rajaee S S. Metallosis in Total Hip Arthroplasty. JBJS reviews. 2023; 11: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00105.
  14. Tognini M, Hothi H, Tucker S, Broomfield E, Shafafy M et al. Blood titanium levels in patients with large and sliding titanium implants. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2022; 23: 783. 10.1186/s12891- 022-05717-8.
  15. Kransdorf M J, Murphey M D, Wessell D E, Cassidy R C, Czuczman G J et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) Soft-Tissue Masses. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018; 15: S189-s197. 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.012.
  16. Obara P, McCool J, Kalva S P, Majdalany B S, Collins J D et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Clinically Suspected Vascular Malformation of the Extremities. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2019; 16: S340 - S347. 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.013.
  17. Bestic J, Wessell D, Beaman F, Cassidy R, Czuczman G et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Primary Bone Tumors. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2020; 17: S226 - S238. 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.038.
  1. Murphey M D, Kransdorf M J. Staging and Classification of Primary Musculoskeletal Bone and Soft-Tissue Tumors According to the 2020 WHO Update, From the AJR Special Series on Cancer Staging. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2021; 217: 1038 - 1052. 10.2214/AJR.21.25658.
  2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Bone Cancer (Version 1.2024). Accessed February 22, 2024. 2023; https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/bone.pdf.
  3. Stanborough R, Demertzis J, Wessell D, Lenchik L, Ahlawat S et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Malignant or Aggressive Primary Musculoskeletal Tumor-Staging and Surveillance: 2022 Update. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2022; 19: S374 - S389. 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.015.
  4. Ha A, Chang E, Bartolotta R, Bucknor M, Chen K et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Osteonecrosis: 2022 Update. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2022; 19: S409 - S416. 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.009.
  5. Habusta S, Mabrouk A, Tuck J. Synovial Chondromatosis. [Updated 2023 Apr 22]. StatPearls Publishing. 2023; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470463/.
  6. Pierce J, Perry M, Wessell D, Lenchik L, Ahlawat S et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Osteomyelitis, Septic Arthritis, or Soft Tissue Infection (Excluding Spine and Diabetic Foot): 2022 Update. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2022; 19: S473 - S487. 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.013.
  7. Wu Y, Wang C, Cheng N, Lin H, Huang H et al. 2024 TSOC/TSPS Joint Consensus: Strategies for Advanced Vascular Wound Management. Acta Cardiologica Sinica. 2024; 40: 1-44. 10.6515/ACS.202401_40(1).20231220A.
  8. Gogu S, Gandbhir V N. Trendelenburg Sign. StatPearls. 2022; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555987/.
  9. Colebatch A N, Edwards C J, Østergaard M, van der Heijde D, Balint P V et al. EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013; 72: 804-14. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203158.
  10. Radu A, Bungau S. Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Overview. Cells. 2021; 10: 10.3390/cells10112857.
  11. Nagy H, Veerapaneni K. Myopathy. [Updated 2023 Aug 14]. StatPearls Publishing. 2023; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562290/.
  12. Chou H, Chin T, Peh W. Dual-energy CT in gout - A review of current concepts and applications. Journal of medical radiation sciences. 2017; 64: 41-51. 10.1002/jmrs.223.
  13. Fortier L, Markel M, Thomas B, Sherman W, Thomas B. An Update on Peroneal Nerve Entrapment and Neuropathy. Orthopedic reviews. 2021; 13: 24937. 0.52965/001c.24937.
  14. Griffith J, Guggenberger R. Peripheral Nerve Imaging. Musculoskeletal Diseases 2021-2024: Diagnostic Imaging [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2021. Chapter 18. 2021; doi: 10.1007/978-3-030- 71281-5_18.
  15. Campbell E, Wilbert C. Foreign Body Imaging. [Updated 2023 Jul 30]. StatPearls Publishing. 2023; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470294/.
  16. Abousayed M, Alley M C, Shakked R, Rosenbaum A J. Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management. JBJS Rev. 2017; 5: e7. 10.2106/jbjs.Rvw.16.00116.
  17. Arain A, Harrington M, Rosenbaum A. Adult-Acquired Flatfoot. [Updated 2023 Aug 8]. StatPearls Publishing. 2023; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542178/.
  1. Iyer R, Chapman T, Chew F. Pediatric bone imaging: diagnostic imaging of osteoid osteoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. May 2012; 198: 1039-52. 10.2214/ajr.10.7313.
  2. Raj M, Tafti D, Kiel J. Pes Planus. [Updated 2023 May 23]. StatPearls Publishing. 2023; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430802/.
  3. Parakh A, An C , Lennartz S, Rajiah P, Yeh B et al. Recognizing and Minimizing Artifacts at Dual- Energy CT. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North. 2021; 41: 509-523. 10.1148/rg.2021200049.

Coding Section

Codes   

Number

Description

CPT

73700

Computed tomography, lower extremity; without contrast material

 

73701

with contrast material(s)

 

73702

without contrast material, followed by contrast material(s) and further sections

 

Procedure and diagnosis codes on Medical Policy documents are included only as a general reference tool for each policy. They may not be all-inclusive.

This medical policy was developed through consideration of peer-reviewed medical literature generally recognized by the relevant medical community, U.S. FDA approval status, nationally accepted standards of medical practice and accepted standards of medical practice in this community, Blue Cross Blue Shield Association technology assessment program (TEC) and other nonaffiliated technology evaluation centers, reference to federal regulations, other plan medical policies, and accredited national guidelines.

"Current Procedural Terminology © American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved" 

History From 2024 Forward 

12/02/2024 Annual review, no change to policy intent but policy reformatted for clarity and consistency. Removing verbiage regarding sonogram for leg length. Adding special note , Contraindication/preferred  for clarity and consistency. Updating references.
01/01/2024 New Policy
Complementary Content
${loading}